Malgorzata Biernikiewicz/iStockphoto/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — Nutek Disposables, Inc. issued a nationwide recall on Monday of baby wipes that may contain bacteria.

The company release says that the products — manufactured under brand names including Cuties, Diapers.com, Femtex, Fred’s, Kidgets, Member’s Mark, Simply Right, Sunny Smiles, Tender Touch and Well Beginnings — were distributed to stores including Walgreens, Sam’s Club, Family Dollar and Fred’s, and to Diapers.com before Oct. 21. Nutek says it received “a small number of complaints of odor and discoloration.” Those complaints prompted them to conduct microbial testing that revealed the presence of a bacteria called Burkholderia cepacia (B. cepacia) in some products.

The bacteria, Nutek says, “poses little medical risk to healthy people.” Still, those with certain health problems may be most susceptible to infections with B. cepacia.

The company has received complaints including rash, irritation, infections, fever, gastrointestinal issues and respiratory issues, though it is unclear whether those issues are related to the use of the product.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Read More →

Creatas/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — A five-year-old child at New York City’s Bellevue Hospital Center on Monday tested negative for Ebola, a statement from the New York City Department of Health and the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation said.

“Out of an abundance of caution, further negative Ebola tests are required on subsequent days to ensure that the patient is cleared,” the statement notes. In addition to testing for other possible illnesses, the child will also remain in isolation until all test results are returned.

“The chances of the average New Yorker contracting Ebola are extremely slim,” the statement points out. Still, hospitals “will be using enhanced scrutiny and an abundance of caution when reviewing questionable cases.”

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Read More →

Malgorzata Biernikiewicz/iStockphoto/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — Nutek Disposables, Inc. issued a nationwide recall on Monday of baby wipes that may contain bacteria.

The company release says that the products — manufactured under brand names including Cuties, Diapers.com, Femtex, Fred’s, Kidgets, Member’s Mark, Simply Right, Sunny Smiles, Tender Touch and Well Beginnings — were distributed to stores including Walgreens, Sam’s Club, Family Dollar and Fred’s, and to Diapers.com before Oct. 21. Nutek says it received “a small number of complaints of odor and discoloration.” Those complaints prompted them to conduct microbial testing that revealed the presence of a bacteria called Burkholderia cepacia (B. cepacia) in some products.

The bacteria, Nutek says, “poses little medical risk to healthy people.” Still, those with certain health problems may be most susceptible to infections with B. cepacia.

The company has received complaints including rash, irritation, infections, fever, gastrointestinal issues and respiratory issues, though it is unclear whether those issues are related to the use of the product.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Read More →

Save The Children(NEW YORK) — Gregg Ramm is helping to battle Ebola in Liberia, but he fears that if he comes home like he plans to in two weeks, he will be put in quarantine and will miss Thanksgiving with his family.

He also believes that the mandatory quarantine policy by New Jersey and New York will make recruiting doctors and nurses to care for Ebola patients — already difficult — even harder.

Ramm said volunteers in Liberia are alarmed by the pictures of nurse Kaci Hickox, who treated Ebola patients in Sierra Leone, being quarantined in a tent at a New Jersey hospital after arriving on a flight at Newark Airport on Friday. Hickox was discharged Monday and was en route to her home in Maine.

“Of course this does not make me happy and it also doesn’t make sense,” said Ramm, the interim country director in Liberia for Save the Children.

Ramm, 52, has been in the Ebola-ravaged West African country for four weeks and plans to return to the U.S. in about two weeks. He said he is worried that he will be stuck in quarantine for three weeks.

“I was planning on spending Thanksgiving with my family,” said Ramm, who lives in Washington, D.C. “It is difficult to imagine remaining in a tent for 21 days like that nurse I saw on the news today.”

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said Monday that healthcare workers returning from West Africa can be quarantined in their homes if they are not showing any symptoms, like a fever or vomiting. The rules for New York and other states are similar.

Hickox was held in quarantine in New Jersey because there were no immediate plans to get her safely to Maine, and she then briefly developed a fever while in quarantine.

Ramm, who would land in Washington’s Dulles Airport, said that aid and healthcare workers based in Liberia are buzzing about the new quarantine rules. Most people find them confusing and unclear, he said, and the prevailing opinion is that mandatory quarantine is an unnecessary and unscientific step.

Since the virus cannot spread unless a person shows symptoms, they believe it is a waste of time to keep people segregated when they are healthy and monitoring body temperature on a regular basis, he said. Ramm said taking your temperature several times daily is already a way of life in Liberia.

Ramm said he and others are also worried about what the quarantines will do to their recruiting efforts.

“Getting people to come here and help is already a difficult job. This will only make it harder,” he said.

It’s unclear how many foreign aid workers are currently treating Ebola patients in West Africa. Save the Children currently has 34 staff members in various parts of West Africa, a spokesman for the organization said. Spokesmen for the World Health Organization and Doctors Without Borders said that both organizations have had over 700 personnel travel to affected countries since the outbreak began in March. Neither group could immediately pinpoint how many of these were American.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Read More →

ABC News(NEW YORK) — At least seven states have issued tougher rules for travelers returning from Ebola-affected regions, some with mandatory quarantines going above and beyond federal guidelines.

The moves are controversial and have sent politicians backpedaling and lawyers reading between the lines.

What are states doing?

A day after New York doctor Craig Spencer was diagnosed with Ebola after traveling home from treating Ebola patients in West Africa, the governors of New York and New Jersey announced that they would enforce mandatory quarantines for all travelers who had close contact with Ebola-infected people and were arriving from Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone — the three countries hit hardest by the current epidemic.

Later the same day, the Illinois Department of Public Health also announced a mandatory 21-day home quarantine for high-risk individuals who cared for Ebola patients in the same countries.

“This protective measure is too important to be voluntary,” Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn said in a statement. “We must take every step necessary to ensure the people of Illinois are protected from potential exposure to the Ebola virus. While we have no confirmed cases of the Ebola virus in Illinois, we will continue to take every safeguard necessary to protect first responders, healthcare workers and the people of Illinois.”

Late Sunday night, the governors of New York and New Jersey stressed that they would allow home quarantines with twice-daily monitoring from health officials. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said mandatory hospital quarantines would only be required of high-risk individuals arriving to New York and New Jersey who are not from either of those states.

Florida, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota and Virginia also announced tougher rules for travelers returning from Ebola-affected regions with the possibility of home quarantine.

Have they quarantined anyone yet?

Yes. On Friday, nurse Kaci Hickox was returning from Sierra Leone, where she had been treating Ebola patients, when she was detained and interrogated at Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey. She had no symptoms but was held against her will until Monday, when they announced they would release her.

Hickox detailed her ordeal in an op-ed for the Dallas Morning News, describing how she was held for six hours at the airport as she was treated “like a criminal.”

In a text message Monday morning, she told ABC News Chief Health and Medical Editor Dr. Richard Besser, “I’m so thankful for the immense attention and support I’ve received. I just hope this nightmare of mine and the fight that I’ve undertaken is not in vain!”

Hickox has tested negative for the virus twice but was held in a quarantine tent at University Hospital in Newark anyway. Her lawyer argued that her basic human rights were being violated.

She was released Monday to return home to Maine, where officials said they will require her to be under quarantine with active monitoring for the remainder of the 21 days — the incubation period for Ebola.

Why are the quarantines controversial?

It doesn’t mesh with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, which assume that someone isn’t contagious until Ebola symptoms appear. And even then, transmission requires contact with bodily fluids like blood and vomit.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said Sunday on ABC News’ This Week, “As a scientist and as a health person, if I were asked, I would not have recommended [mandatory quarantines].”

What are the federal rules?

The CDC announced on Oct. 22 that all airline passengers traveling from Ebola-affected nations would get Ebola kits and be required to self-monitor for 21 days, which is the maximum length of time it takes someone exposed to the virus to show symptoms. They are required to take their temperature twice daily and answer several questions about their symptoms, according to the CDC. If they do not report, they will be tracked down, the agency said.

Under CDC rules, doctors returning from treating Ebola patients in West Africa need to monitor their symptoms for 21 days, not quarantine themselves. Doctors Without Borders has similar guidelines.

“Self-quarantine is neither warranted nor recommended when a person is not displaying Ebola-like symptoms,” Doctors Without Borders said Thursday in a statement. “However, returned staff members are discouraged from returning to work during the 21-day period.”

Are the quarantines legal?

Public health lawyer Wendy Mariner, who teaches at Boston University School of Law, said the legalities of the quarantines depend on the laws in the states mandating them. In New York, the 9/11 attacks prompted the creation of stronger laws, allowing for people to be detained “even if they only might have been exposed to someone who might be sick,” she said.

“That’s a pretty broad determination, which, to my knowledge, has not been challenged,” she said, adding that her colleagues think it’s not an issue of the public panicking — it’s an issue of politicians panicking in an election year.

Still, she said that if President Barack Obama wanted to formally declare the quarantines a national security issue, he could override the states. She said because they relate to borders, it is a federal matter.

Northwestern University professor of constitutional law Eugene Kontorovich disagreed, saying that state officials have the right to keep possibly-infected individuals from moving around their territories.

“The president is not doing that and not going to do that for political reasons,” Kontorovich said. “Overriding quarantines puts it all on him if it doesn’t work out.”

Mariner said she thinks the quarantines are problematic — and could become a federal matter — because they will discourage health workers from traveling to West Africa to stop the Ebola outbreak at its source.

“It’s a little odd to single them out,” she said, adding that health workers are more likely to want to keep from spreading the disease they’ve been fighting and more likely to recognize the symptoms. “If you single out anyone who works with Ebola then you probably have to quarantine U.S. healthcare workers and U.S. hospital workers treating Ebola patients.”

Do these quarantines violate the Constitution?

Since the United States has a history of upholding quarantines, Kontorovich said the states have the right to enforce quarantines beyond the CDC guidelines. He said states wouldn’t be able to impose a quarantine for the common cold, but because Ebola is a fatal disease with no cure, strict quarantines are permissible.

Kontorovich said Hickox’s situation reminded him of a 1963 case in which a woman returning from Europe was isolated because she had traveled to a town in the midst of a smallpox outbreak. The woman, despite taking the matter to court, was quarantined for 14 days upon her return to New York even though she wasn’t sick.

The states get to decide how they want to protect their citizens, he noted, and don’t have to be conservative to do so. The greater good of the state outweighs the individual’s freedoms for three weeks, he said, adding that he’s glad New York has announced that it will be compensating the people it quarantines.

State governments can either be too strict and sacrifice a handful of people’s freedom for 21 days or be too lax and allow people to become infected, he said. As a result, it would rather err on the side of caution.

“Once people are infected, you can’t make them healthy, you can’t put them back in the box,” he said.

Self-monitoring assumes people will be compliant, he said, but there’s no need for states to trust that this will happen.

“Your neighbors are not required to trust you,” Kontorovich said.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Read More →

ABC News(NEW YORK) — Halloween marks the end of October and the beginning of diet-busting season. But before you dive into the Halloween goodies, Dave Zinczenko, ABC nutrition-wellness editor and author of bestselling book series Eat This, Not That!, explains how choosing smaller sized candies can do less damage to your waistline.

The average American eats more than 24 pounds of candy each year. Making these smart swaps can save each person as many as 100 calories a day, or as much as 10 pounds per year.

How the Candies Compare:

Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups (1.5 ounces) vs. Butterfinger Original (2 ounces, or 25 percent larger than the Reese’s). Which do you think packs more of a punch?

The Reese’s has 210 cals, 13 g fat, 4.5 sat fat, 21 g sugar, while the Butterfinger has 270 cals, 11 g fat, 6 g sat fat, 29g sugar.

Because the Reese’s is smaller, the big difference here is sugar. The American Heart Association wants adult women to eat no more than 25 grams a day. With Butterfinger, you’re already over that total with one bar, Zinczenko said.

Eat this: Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups. It’ll save you 60 calories and 8 grams of sugar.

M&M’s Pretzels (32.3 grams) vs. M&M’s Dark Chocolate (47.9 grams). Which has more than twice the fat of the other?

The M&M’s Pretzels has 150 cals, 4.5g fat, 3g sat fat, 17g sugar, while the M&M’s Dark Chocolate has 240 cals, 11g fat, 7g sat fat, 27g sugar. The Dark Chocolate package is actually heavier than the regular-sized bag of M&M Pretzels, but even so, they still have more calories, fat and sugar per gram than the M&M Pretzels.

Eat this: M&M Pretzels will save you 90 calories and 6.5 grams of fat.

York Peppermint Patties (1.4 ounce) vs. Mounds Bar (1.75 ounce). Which of these cream-filled candies will save you 100 calories?

The York Peppermint Pattie has 140 cals, 2.5g fat, 1.5g sat fat, 25g sugar, while the Mounds Bar, which is 25 percent larger, has 240 cals, 13g fat, 10g sat fat, 21g sugar. The Mounds bar has half a day’s worth of saturated fat. You’d have to eat seven Peppermint Patties to get as much saturated fat as in one Mounds bar, Zinczenko said.

Eat this: York Peppermint Pattie, which saves you 100 calories and 8.5 grams of fat.

Three rolls of Smarties (7g per roll) vs. 1 package of Sweet Tarts (51 grams).

Each roll of Smarties has 25 cals, 0 fat, 6g sugar, so 3 rolls weigh 21 g with 75 cals, 0g fat, 18g sugar. While the one package of the Sweet Tarts has 1.8 ounces (or 51 grams), it’s important to note that each roll of Sweet Tarts is approximately three servings (with eight pieces per serving). Per serving, that’s 50 cals, 0 fat, 13g sugar and for three servings it comes out to a total of 150 cals, 0 fat, 39g sugar.

So which of these will give you 50 percent less sugar? Zinczenko said this is a great example of “unit bias,” which means a person is more likely to see the Sweet Tarts roll as one unit/one serving. Closer examination of the label reveals what the candy maker believes is a serving.

Eat this: Three rolls of Smarties will save you 75 calories and 21 grams of sugar.

Learn more about smart swaps at eatthis.com.

ABC News reached out to all of the companies for comment, and here are their responses:

Response Statement from Hershey’s:
As one of America’s most beloved brands, Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups have been enjoyed by consumers for more than 80 years. With this rich heritage and longstanding commitment to quality, only Reese’s can deliver the authentic, perfect combination of chocolate and peanut butter. The superior taste synonymous with Reese’s makes it one of the most popular Halloween and everyday candies.

Response Statement from MARS:
All single serve Mars Chocolate products around the world are 250 calories or less as part of our commitment to provide consumers with treats that can be enjoyed as part of a healthy, balanced lifestyle.

Response Statement from Smarties:
Smarties® Candy Company, now in our 65th year, is proud to participate in enhancing the fun at Halloween for the children. Smarties® are only 25 calories per candy roll, fat free, gluten free, and packaged in a tamper evident wrapper. Candy is a treat and never meant to replace a balanced diet and exercise.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Read More →

ABC/Jeff Neira(NEW YORK) — Since giving birth to her first child in February, Daphne Oz has learned first-hand how hard it is to shed the baby weight and says moms need to cut themselves some slack.

“There’s a big gap between what people hear and how it actually is,” The Chew co-host told the November/December 2014 issue of Fitness magazine. “Everyone needs to choose what works for them, and it’s not fair to you to compare your progress to others. We have to reinforce that shedding pounds is a long, hard process.”

The 28-year-old daughter of Dr. Mehmet Oz welcomed a daughter, Philomena, with her husband, John Jovanovic, in February.

Immediately after giving birth, she said she was surprised to learn that she still looked pregnant.

“You still look six months pregnant once you’re home from the hospital. Your body does not instantly bounce back,” she told Fitness. “I don’t own a scale, because it would make me neurotic, but I thought I knew where I’d be when I went for my first doctor appointment a few weeks after giving birth. I’d lost only 10 pounds!”

Now, she said, she is in no rush to drop the baby weight.

“It’s a priority, but it’s one of many. I’m breast-feeding, so my priorities include eating to nourish my baby, gaining muscle tone and feeling good. It’s about being back in charge of my body,” she said. “The weight isn’t pouring off, but I figure that it takes nine months to have a baby and it’ll take at least that long for it to come off.”

As for her workout routine as a new mom?

“I figure out how much time I have and adjust my routine to fit. Philomena loves being in the stroller or carrier, so that’s how I’ll get a walk in. I run about four miles three to four times a week, and I intersperse that with half-hour online workouts,” she said.

To keep herself motivated, even when she’s too tired to exercise, Oz said, “I put on my workout clothes, and I don’t let myself think about it. Once I’m out for a run or doing a video, I’m on my way to finishing it. The 10 minutes between waking up and showing up are the most dangerous.”

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Read More →

Marian McConnell(NEW YORK) — In the finals moments of his life, Edwin Gehlert was surrounded by his family and loved ones. But as he took his last breaths, a somewhat unfamiliar face was curled up right next to Gehlert on his hospital bed. That face belonged to Tom, the tabby cat.

“We had seen Tom in and out of daddy’s room on a few of our visits,” Gehlert’s daughter Pam Thompson said. “But on that day it’s like he knew something was different.”

Tom sat with Gehlert and comforted him and his family, placing his paw in Gehlert’s hand immediately after his passing.

“I would never have believed a cat could have touched my heart like this cat did, but I truly felt like God was speaking to me that afternoon through Tom,” Thompson said. “It was as if Tom’s paw was God’s hand leading my daddy up towards that light to heaven, just as I had been begging him to do for weeks.”

Tom is responsible for many comforting stories since arriving at the VA Medical Center in Salem, Virginia, in May 2012.

Laura Hart, the lead physician’s assistant at the Salem VA, said she came up with the idea to bring Tom to the palliative care unit after hearing Dr. David Dosa speak at a conference in Denver. Dosa is the author of Making Rounds with Oscar, a book about a cat named Oscar who comforted Alzheimer’s patients in a nursing center in Rhode Island.

“We’re trying to make it a home-like environment, which is hard to do in a hospital,” Hart said. “But we know the little things, like a pet, make it more bearable.”

Hart and colleague Dottie Rizzo, the VA’s hospice and palliative care coordinator, then began their search for the perfect cat. They found a veterinarian in Salem who asked local shelters for a cat that they think would fit the bill. Salem Animal Shelter immediately thought of their cat Tom. He ended up being the perfect match.

“We have seen first-hand the impact that he makes on the families and the patients and even our staff,” Rizzo said. “A hospice can be a really sad place to be and work and Tom brings a calmness and normalcy to our unit. We try to be a home-like environment and a pet kind of takes it to the level that maybe it is a little more like home here with him.”

Tom helps lift the spirits of patients, families and staff alike, Hart said, noting that families are comforted by his presence, knowing that when they leave the VA their loved ones will find company in a small, furry friend.

“Families don’t want their loved ones being alone, and it’s comforting for them to know Tom is there,” Hart said. “And it’s amazing how many of the families really feel that Tom is there to be with their family member when they die, whether he kind of comes and herds the family into the room right before the patient passes, or he just curls up on a patient’s bed in their final hours.”

And that experience leaves families with a little more peace and serenity in some of their toughest moments, just like it did for Thompson and her family.

“I left the VA that afternoon with a smile on my face and love in my heart knowing that my father was now at peace and on his way to a wonderful new adventure and it was all with the help of Tom the Cat,” Thompson said.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Read More →

iStock/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — More moms are admitting that social media can be a serious stress factor in their lives, and a new survey suggests that many of them are thinking about pulling the plug.

“For new moms it’s a great place to ask for parenting advice, but then on the other side, you get some who are too opinionated and that can get in the way,” said Francisa Morales, a stay-at-home-mom of two from New York. “I don’t have time to post everything I do and that’s where it seems like people are trying to make their lives seem perfect, when they post every little thing about their lives.”

Just as mothers are affirming some frustrations with social media, researchers are establishing that there is in fact a connection between moms and social media stress.

The online survey found that out of 1,400 mothers, 53 percent of the women considered taking a break from social media. Sixty percent of younger moms ages 18 to 24 said they wish to cut back on platforms such as Facebook and Instagram.

The opt-in survey was administered by Impulse Research, a communications and marketing research firm, and published by Current Lifestyle Marketing this year.

“Through ongoing research we started noticing a trend of moms commenting that they are getting sick of social, millennial moms can be particularly vocal about it,” says Amy Colton, executive vice president of Current Marketing. “We wanted to check the trend, so we conducted quantitative research to confirm what we have been hearing.”

The survey did not define how long people would like to unplug from social media, but asked “Do you ever consider stopping use of, or taking a break from, social media because you are burned out or frustrated with it?”

Millennial moms had specific reasons for wanting to lay off social media platforms.

The number one reason moms cited was people sharing too much information, while millennial moms cited annoying invites and excess brand marketing as their top reasons.

“We are becoming performers on social media,” said Suzana Flores, a clinical psychologist and an expert on emotional side effects of social media.

“Our friends are no longer our friends, they’re our audience, so there’s this competition of one-upmanship,” said, Flores, author of Facehooked: How Facebook Affects Our Emotions, Relationships, and Lives.

The survey also finds that young moms often feel the pressure to present perfect lives on social channels.

“We selectively choose what we post and how we perceive ourselves,” Flores said. “Facebook and other networks are incredible ways to seek encouragement and validation. Hearing that ‘you’re a good mom’ is something everyone wants to hear. The negative side is that we no longer trust our inner voice and rely on the external noise of social media to determine our self-worth.”

“It’s about learning to maintain a balance,” Flores said. “The digital world should be second to our real-life relationships.”

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Read More →

Handout Phot(NEWARK, N.J.) — New Jersey has decided to release a nurse who was forcibly quarantined after she returned from Africa where she treated Ebola patients.

The release was announced Monday morning after Kaci Hickox, hired a lawyer to sue over her mandatory quarantine for 21 days. Shortly before the decision by the New Jersey Health Department, the nurse said she hopes “this nightmare of mine and the fight that I’ve undertaken is not in vain.”

Hickox, who has no signs of the lethal virus, has announced that she intends to sue over New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s policy of a 21-day mandatory quarantine for health care workers returning from helping Ebola patients in West Africa.

Monday morning, the nurse sent a message to ABC News’ Chief Health and Medical Editor Dr. Richard Besser thanking people for taking her side.

“I’m so thankful for the immense attention and support I’ve received. I just hope this nightmare of mine and the fight that I’ve undertaken is not in vain!” Hickox wrote.

Hickox, 33, has hired civil rights attorney Norman Siegel to fight her mandatory quarantine. The nurse has said she feels that her “basic human rights are being violated,” kept in a isolation tent at Universisty Hospital in Newark, despite showing no symptoms of the Ebola virus.

“Medically speaking there’s no reason for the state of New Jersey to keep her quarantined,” Siegel said outside the hospital on Sunday. “She very simply wants to be released. We will advocate for the state of New Jersey and the governor to release her as soon as possible.”

Hickox, who was treating Ebola patients in Sierra Leone for Doctors Without Borders, never registered a fever so there is no medical reason to keep her quarantined, he said.

She is the first person quarantined under a new strict policy instituted by Christie on Friday.

New York, Illinois and Florida also instituted mandatory quarantines for anyone exposed to people infected with Ebola health. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced that the state will allow home quarantines for people showing no symptoms, rather than requiring isolation in hospitals.

The policies have drawn the attention of the Obama administration, which told the governors of New Jersey and New York that there are “concerns” about the mandatory quarantines, a senior administration official said today.

Hickox told CNN she is being held in a “tent structure” outside of University Hospital, “with a port-a-potty like structure and no shower and no connection to the outside world except my iPhone.”

“This is an extreme that is really unacceptable, and I feel like my basic human rights have been violated,” Hickox told CNN.

Medical experts say that there is no reason for mandatory quarantines, since unless a person is showing symptoms of Ebola, they are not contagious.

“As a scientist and as a health person, if I were asked I would not have recommended [mandatory quarantines],” Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said Sunday on This Week.

Christie has said he concluded the quarantine was necessary to protect public health in his state and that he thinks the CDC “eventually will come around to our point of view on this.”

A New York doctor, Craig Spencer, who returned from treating Ebola patients in Africa has tested positive for the virus and is being treated at Bellevue Hospital in Manhattan. His fiancee, Morgan Dixon, and two other people he came into close contact with have also been quarantined, but they haven’t shown any symptoms.

In addition, a 5-year-old boy who returned from Guinea on Saturday was taken to a New York City hospital on Sunday with Ebola-like symptoms. When the boy’s temperature spiked this morning, doctors decided to test him for Ebola.

More ABC news videos | ABC Health News

Follow @ABCNewsRadio

Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Read More →